Beyond function: Engineering improved peptides for therapeutic applications
Sayanee Adhikari
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland
Search for more papers by this authorJesse A. Leissa
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Amy J. Karlsson
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland
Fischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland
Correspondence
Amy J. Karlsson, Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Maryland, 2113 Chemical and Nuclear Engineering Building (#090), College Park, MD 20742.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorSayanee Adhikari
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland
Search for more papers by this authorJesse A. Leissa
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Amy J. Karlsson
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland
Fischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland
Correspondence
Amy J. Karlsson, Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Maryland, 2113 Chemical and Nuclear Engineering Building (#090), College Park, MD 20742.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Peptides are a promising source of new therapeutics, but the biophysical characteristics of natural peptides, including their stability and propensity to aggregate, can limit their success. Protein engineering offers powerful tools to improve the properties of peptides for biological applications. In this review, we explain rational design, directed evolution, and computational methods and how these methods can be applied to improving the characteristics of peptides. We also provide a discussion of engineering the thermodynamic stability, self-assembly, reduced aggregation, proteolytic stability, and binding affinity and specificity of peptides, along with a perspective on future directions in engineering therapeutic peptides.
REFERENCES
- 1Fosgerau K, Hoffmann T. Peptide therapeutics: current status and future directions. Drug Discov Today. 2015; 20(1): 122-128.
- 2Uhlig T, Kyprianou T, Martinelli FG, et al. The emergence of peptides in the pharmaceutical business: from exploration to exploitation. EuPA Open Proteom. 2014; 4: 58-69.
- 3Lau JL, Dunn MK. Therapeutic peptides: historical perspectives, current development trends, and future directions. Bioorg Med Chem. 2018; 26(10): 2700-2707.
- 4Otvos L Jr, Wade JD. Current challenges in peptide-based drug discovery. Front Chem. 2014; 2: 62.
- 5Abbvie Inc. Form 10-K 2018. Retrieved from U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission EDGAR: https://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html. Filed 2019, February 27.
- 6Sanofi. Form 20-F 2018. Retrieved from U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission EDGAR: https://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html. Filed 2019, March 8.
- 7Gupta S, Jain A, Chakraborty M, Sahni JK, Ali J, Dang S. Oral delivery of therapeutic proteins and peptides: a review on recent developments. Drug Deliv. 2013; 20(6): 237-246.
- 8Qvit N, Rubin SJS, Urban TJ, Mochly-Rosen D, Gross ER. Peptidomimetic therapeutics: scientific approaches and opportunities. Drug Discov Today. 2017; 22(2): 454-462.
- 9Neumann-Staubitz P, Neumann H. The use of unnatural amino acids to study and engineer protein function. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2016; 38: 119-128.
- 10Joshi S, Chen L, Winter MB, et al. The rational design of therapeutic peptides for aminopeptidase N using a substrate-based approach. Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1): 1424.
- 11Lipovsek D, Mena M, Lippow SM, Basu S, Baynes BMB. Library construction for protein engineering. In: SJ Park, JR Cochran, eds. Protein Engineering and Design. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2010: 83-108.
- 12Lehmann M, Wyss M. Engineering proteins for thermostability: the use of sequence alignments versus rational design and directed evolution. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2001; 12(4): 371-375.
- 13Song JK, Rhee JS. Simultaneous enhancement of thermostability and catalytic activity of phospholipase A1 by evolutionary molecular engineering. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000; 66(3): 890-894.
- 14Yokobayashi Y, Weiss R, Arnold FH. Directed evolution of a genetic circuit. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99(26): 16587-16591.
- 15Arnold FH. Design by directed evolution. Acc Chem Res. 1998; 31(3): 125-131.
- 16Wittrup KD. Protein engineering by cell-surface display. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2001; 12(4): 395-399.
- 17Jenson JM, Xue V, Stretz L, Mandal T, Reich LL, Keating AE. Peptide design by optimization on a data-parameterized protein interaction landscape. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018; 115(44): E10342-E10351.
- 18Lamla T, Erdmann VA. Searching sequence space for high-affinity binding peptides using ribosome display. J Mol Biol. 2003; 329(2): 381-388.
- 19Winter G, Griffiths AD, Hawkins RE, Hoogenboom HR. Making antibodies by phage display technology. Annu Rev Immunol. 1994; 12(1): 433-455.
- 20Smith GP. Filamentous fusion phage: novel expression vectors that display cloned antigens on the virion surface. Science. 1985; 228(4705): 1315-1317.
- 21Pande J, Szewczyk MM, Grover AK. Phage display: concept, innovations, applications and future. Biotechnol Adv. 2010; 28(6): 849-858.
- 22Cherf GM, Cochran JR. Applications of yeast surface display for protein engineering. Methods Mol Biol. 2015; 1319: 155-175.
- 23Boder ET, Wittrup KD. Yeast surface display for screening combinatorial polypeptide libraries. Nat Biotechnol. 1997; 15(6): 553-557.
- 24Simeon R, Chen Z. In vitro-engineered non-antibody protein therapeutics. Protein Cell. 2018; 9(1): 3-14.
- 25Charbit A, Boulain JC, Ryter A, Hofnung M. Probing the topology of a bacterial membrane protein by genetic insertion of a foreign epitope; expression at the cell surface. EMBO J. 1986; 5(11): 3029-3037.
- 26Freudl R, MacIntyre S, Degen M, Henning U. Cell surface exposure of the outer membrane protein OmpA of Escherichia coli K-12. J Mol Biol. 1986; 188(3): 491-494.
- 27Nicolay T, Vanderleyden J, Spaepen S. Autotransporter-based cell surface display in gram-negative bacteria. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2015; 41(1): 109-123.
- 28Daugherty PS. Protein engineering with bacterial display. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2007; 17(4): 474-480.
- 29Lu Z, Murray KS, Cleave VV, LaVallie ER, Stahl ML, McCoy JM. Expression of thioredoxin random peptide libraries on the Escherichia coli cell surface as functional fusions to flagellin: a system designed for exploring protein-protein interactions. Biotechnology (NY). 1995; 13(4): 366-372.
- 30Mishra B, Reiling S, Zarena D, Wang G. Host defense antimicrobial peptides as antibiotics: design and application strategies. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2017; 38: 87-96.
- 31Lee SY, Choi JH, Xu Z. Microbial cell-surface display. Trends Biotechnol. 2003; 21(1): 45-52.
- 32Hanes J, Pluckthun A. In vitro selection and evolution of functional proteins by using ribosome display. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997; 94(10): 4937-4942.
- 33He M, Taussig MJ. Ribosome display: cell-free protein display technology. Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic. 2002; 1(2): 204-212.
- 34Reetz MT, Carballeira JD. Iterative saturation mutagenesis (ISM) for rapid directed evolution of functional enzymes. Nat Protoc. 2007; 2(4): 891-903.
- 35Reetz MT, Carballeira JD, Vogel A. Iterative saturation mutagenesis on the basis of B factors as a strategy for increasing protein thermostability. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2006; 45(46): 7745-7751.
- 36Reetz MT, Wang LW, Bocola M. Directed evolution of enantioselective enzymes: iterative cycles of CASTing for probing protein-sequence space. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2006; 45(8): 1236-1241.
- 37Bradley LH. High-quality combinatorial protein libraries using the binary patterning approach. Methods Mol Biol. 2014; 1216: 117-128.
- 38Bradley LH, Wei Y, Thumfort P, Wurth C, Hecht MH. Protein design by binary patterning of polar and nonpolar amino acids. Methods Mol Biol. 2007; 352: 155-166.
- 39Kamtekar S, Schiffer JM, Xiong H, Babik JM, Hecht MH. Protein design by binary patterning of polar and nonpolar amino acids. Science. 1993; 262(5140): 1680-1685.
- 40West MW, Wang W, Patterson J, Mancias JD, Beasley JR, Hecht MH. De novo amyloid proteins from designed combinatorial libraries. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999; 96(20): 11211-11216.
- 41Wilson DS, Keefe AD, Szostak JW. The use of mRNA display to select high-affinity protein-binding peptides. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001; 98(7): 3750-3755.
- 42Coluzza I. Computational protein design: a review. J Phys Condens Matter. 2017; 29(14): 143001.
- 43Zhou P, Wang C, Ren Y, Yang C, Tian F. Computational peptidology: a new and promising approach to therapeutic peptide design. Curr Med Chem. 2013; 20(15): 1985-1996.
- 44Nikiforovich GV. Computational molecular modeling in peptide drug design. Int J Pept Protein Res. 1994; 44(6): 513-531.
- 45Beck DA, White GW, Daggett V. Exploring the energy landscape of protein folding using replica-exchange and conventional molecular dynamics simulations. J Struct Biol. 2007; 157(3): 514-523.
- 46Yesylevskyy S, Marrink SJ, Mark AE. Alternative mechanisms for the interaction of the cell-penetrating peptides penetrating and the TAT peptide with lipid bilayers. Biophys J. 2009; 97(1): 40-49.
- 47Nguyen TH, Rao NZ, Schroeder WM, Moore PB. Coarse-grained molecular dynamics of tetrameric transmembrane peptide bundles within a lipid bilayer. Chem Phys Lipids. 2010; 163(6): 530-537.
- 48Shelley MY, Selvan ME, Zhao J, et al. A new mixed all-atom/coarse-grained model: application to Melittin aggregation in aqueous solution. J Chem Theory Comput. 2017; 13(8): 3881-3897.
- 49Fjell CD, Jenssen H, Hilpert K, et al. Identification of novel antibacterial peptides by chemoinformatics and machine learning. J Med Chem. 2009; 52(7): 2006-2015.
- 50Khosravian M, Faramarzi FK, Beigi MM, Behbahani M, Mohabatkar H. Predicting antibacterial peptides by the concept of Chou's pseudo-amino acid composition and machine learning methods. Protein Pept Lett. 2013; 20(2): 180-186.
- 51Sanders WS, Johnston CI, Bridges SM, Burgess SC, Willeford KO. Prediction of cell penetrating peptides by support vector machines. PLoS Comput Biol. 2011; 7(7):e1002101.
- 52Nielsen H, Brunak S, von Heijne G. Machine learning approaches for the prediction of signal peptides and other protein sorting signals. Protein Eng. 1999; 12(1): 3-9.
- 53Verma R, Schwaneberg U, Roccatano D. Computer-aided protein directed evolution: a review of web servers, databases and other computational tools for protein engineering. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2012; 2:e201209008.
- 54Camacho CJ, Katsumata Y, Ascherman DP. Structural and thermodynamic approach to peptide immunogenicity. PLoS Comput Biol. 2008; 4(11):e1000231.
- 55Sani MA, Separovic F. How membrane-active peptides get into lipid membranes. Acc Chem Res. 2016; 49(6): 1130-1138.
- 56Sommese RF, Sivaramakrishnan S, Baldwin RL, Spudich JA. Helicity of short E-R/K peptides. Protein Sci. 2010; 19(10): 2001-2005.
- 57Swanson CJ, Sivaramakrishnan S. Harnessing the unique structural properties of isolated α-helices. J Biol Chem. 2014; 289(37): 25460-25467.
- 58Wolny M, Batchelor M, Bartlett GJ, et al. Characterization of long and stable de novo single α-helix domains provides novel insight into their stability. Sci Rep. 2017; 7: 44341.
- 59Chou S, Shao C, Wang J, et al. Short, multiple-stranded beta-hairpin peptides have antimicrobial potency with high selectivity and salt resistance. Acta Biomater. 2016; 30: 78-93.
- 60Bureau HR, Hershkovits E, Quirk S, Hernandez R. Determining the energetics of small β-sheet peptides using adaptive steered molecular dynamics. J Chem Theory Comput. 2016; 12(4): 2028-2037.
- 61Capelli R, Villemot F, Moroni E, Tiana G, van der Vaart A, Colombo G. Assessment of mutational effects on peptide stability through confinement simulations. J Phys Chem Lett. 2016; 7(1): 126-130.
- 62Yakimov AP, Afanaseva AS, Khodorkovskiy MA, Petukhov MG. Design of stable α-helical peptides and thermostable proteins in biotechnology and biomedicine. Acta Naturae. 2016; 8(4): 70-81.
- 63Eijsink VG, Gaseidnes S, Borchert TV, van den Burg B. Directed evolution of enzyme stability. Biomol Eng. 2005; 22(1–3): 21-30.
- 64Giver L, Gershenson A, Freskgard PO, Arnold FH. Directed evolution of a thermostable esterase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998; 95(22): 12809-12813.
- 65Socha RD, Tokuriki N. Modulating protein stability—directed evolution strategies for improved protein function. FEBS J. 2013; 280(22): 5582-5595.
- 66Traxlmayr MW, Obinger C. Directed evolution of proteins for increased stability and expression using yeast display. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2012; 526(2): 174-180.
- 67Bond CJ, Marsters JC, Sidhu SS. Contributions of CDR3 to VHH domain stability and the design of monobody scaffolds for naive antibody libraries. J Mol Biol. 2003; 332(3): 643-655.
- 68Julian MC, Lee CC, Tiller KE, et al. Co-evolution of affinity and stability of grafted amyloid-motif domain antibodies. Protein Eng Des Sel. 2015; 28(10): 339-350.
- 69Groschel AH, Muller AH. Self-assembly concepts for multicompartment nanostructures. Nanoscale. 2015; 7(28): 11841-11876.
- 70Tian X, Sun F, Zhou XR, Luo SZ, Chen L. Role of peptide self-assembly in antimicrobial peptides. J Pept Sci. 2015; 21(7): 530-539.
- 71Habibi N, Kamaly N, Memic A, Shafiee H. Self-assembled peptide-based nanostructures: smart nanomaterials toward targeted drug delivery. Nano Today. 2016; 11(1): 41-60.
- 72Deidda G, Jonnalagadda SVR, Spies JW, et al. Self-assembled amyloid peptides with Arg-Gly-asp (RGD) motifs as scaffolds for tissue engineering. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2016; 3(7): 1404-1416.
- 73Zhou XR, Cao Y, Zhang Q, et al. Self-assembly nanostructure controlled sustained release, activity and stability of peptide drugs. Int J Pharm. 2017; 528(1–2): 723-731.
- 74Zhang H, Park J, Jiang Y, Woodrow KA. Rational design of charged peptides that self-assemble into robust nanofibers as immune-functional scaffolds. Acta Biomater. 2017; 55: 183-193.
- 75Frederix PW, Scott GG, Abul-Haija YM, et al. Exploring the sequence space for (tri-)peptide self-assembly to design and discover new hydrogels. Nat Chem. 2015; 7(1): 30-37.
- 76Wang M, Wang J, Zhou P, et al. Nanoribbons self-assembled from short peptides demonstrate the formation of polar zippers between β-sheets. Nat Commun. 2018; 9(1): 5118.
- 77Chen Y, Xing Z, Liao D, Qiu F. Neglected hydrophobicity of dimethanediyl group in peptide self-assembly: a hint from amyloid-like peptide GNNQQNY and its derivatives. J Phys Chem B. 2018; 122(46): 10470-10477.
- 78Rad-Malekshahi M, Lempsink L, Amidi M, Hennink WE, Mastrobattista E. Biomedical applications of self-assembling peptides. Bioconjug Chem. 2016; 27(1): 3-18.
- 79Zhou P, Deng L, Wang Y, Lu JR, Xu H. Different nanostructures caused by competition of intra- and inter-β-sheet interactions in hierarchical self-assembly of short peptides. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2016; 464: 219-228.
- 80Fowler SB, Poon S, Muff R, Chiti F, Dobson CM, Zurdo J. Rational design of aggregation-resistant bioactive peptides: reengineering human calcitonin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102(29): 10105-10110.
- 81Schellekens H. Bioequivalence and the immunogenicity of biopharmaceuticals. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2002; 1(6): 457-462.
- 82Zapadka KL, Becher FJ, Gomes Dos Santos AL, Jackson SE. Factors affecting the physical stability (aggregation) of peptide therapeutics. Interface Focus. 2017; 7(6): 20170030.
- 83Chiti F, Stefani M, Taddei N, Ramponi G, Dobson CM. Rationalization of the effects of mutations on peptide and protein aggregation rates. Nature. 2003; 424(6950): 805-808.
- 84Hou Q, Bourgeas R, Pucci F, Rooman M. Computational analysis of the amino acid interactions that promote or decrease protein solubility. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1): 14661.
- 85Esler WP, Stimson ER, Ghilardi JR, et al. Point substitution in the central hydrophobic cluster of a human β-amyloid congener disrupts peptide folding and abolishes plaque competence. Biochemistry. 1996; 35(44): 13914-13921.
- 86Azriel R, Gazit E. Analysis of the minimal amyloid-forming fragment of the islet amyloid polypeptide. An experimental support for the key role of the phenylalanine residue in amyloid formation. J Biol Chem. 2001; 276(36): 34156-34161.
- 87Ashburn TT, Lansbury PT. Interspecies sequence variations affect the kinetics and thermodynamics of amyloid formation: peptide models of pancreatic amyloid. J Am Chem Soc. 1993; 115(23): 11012-11013.
- 88Gsponer J, Haberthur U, Caflisch A. The role of side-chain interactions in the early steps of aggregation: molecular dynamics simulations of an amyloid-forming peptide from the yeast prion Sup35. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100(9): 5154-5159.
- 89Armstrong AH, Chen J, McKoy AF, Hecht MH. Mutations that replace aromatic side chains promote aggregation of the Alzheimer's Aβ peptide. Biochemistry. 2011; 50(19): 4058-4067.
- 90Kim W, Hecht MH. Generic hydrophobic residues are sufficient to promote aggregation of the Alzheimer's Aβ42 peptide. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006; 103(43): 15824-15829.
- 91McGregor DP. Discovering and improving novel peptide therapeutics. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2008; 8(5): 616-619.
- 92Fominaya J, Bravo J, Rebollo A. Strategies to stabilize cell penetrating peptides for in vivo applications. Ther Deliv. 2015; 6(10): 1171-1194.
- 93Ji S, Li W, Zhang L, Zhang Y, Cao B. Cecropin A-melittin mutant with improved proteolytic stability and enhanced antimicrobial activity against bacteria and fungi associated with gastroenteritis in vitro. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2014; 451(4): 650-655.
- 94Sun X, Salih E, Oppenheim FG, Helmerhorst EJ. Activity-based mass spectrometric characterization of proteases and inhibitors in human saliva. Proteomics Clin Appl. 2009; 3(7): 810-820.
- 95Soder PO. Proteolytic activity in the oral cavity: proteolytic enzymes from human saliva and dental plaque material. J Dent Res. 1972; 51(2): 389-393.
- 96Nakamura M, Slots J. Salivary enzymes. Origin and relationship to periodontal disease. J Periodontal Res. 1983; 18(6): 559-569.
- 97Naglik JR, Challacombe SJ, Hube B. Candida albicans secreted aspartyl proteinases in virulence and pathogenesis. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2003; 67(3): 400-428.
- 98Sriranganadane D, Waridel P, Salamin K, et al. Aspergillus protein degradation pathways with different secreted protease sets at neutral and acidic pH. J Proteome Res. 2010; 9(7): 3511-3519.
- 99Molhoek EM, van Dijk A, Veldhuizen EJ, Haagsman HP, Bikker FJ. Improved proteolytic stability of chicken cathelicidin-2 derived peptides by D-amino acid substitutions and cyclization. Peptides. 2011; 32(5): 875-880.
- 100Leisle L, Valiyaveetil F, Mehl RA, Ahern CA. Incorporation of non-canonical amino acids. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2015; 869: 119-151.
- 101McGlinchey RP, Lee JC. Cysteine cathepsins are essential in lysosomal degradation of alpha-synuclein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015; 112(30): 9322-9327.
- 102Ikonomova SP, Moghaddam-Taaheri P, Jabra-Rizk MA, Wang Y, Karlsson AJ. Engineering improved variants of the antifungal peptide histatin 5 with reduced susceptibility to Candida albicans secreted aspartic proteases and enhanced antimicrobial potency. FEBS J. 2018; 285(1): 146-159.
- 103Wang J, Song J, Yang Z, et al. Antimicrobial peptides with high proteolytic resistance for combating gram-negative bacteria. J Med Chem. 2019; 62(5): 2286-2304.
- 104Howell SM, Fiacco SV, Takahashi TT, et al. Serum stable natural peptides designed by mRNA display. Sci Rep. 2014; 4: 6008.
- 105Sieber V, Pluckthun A, Schmid FX. Selecting proteins with improved stability by a phage-based method. Nat Biotechnol. 1998; 16(10): 955-960.
- 106Jiang W, Boder ET. High-throughput engineering and analysis of peptide binding to class II MHC. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010; 107(30): 13258-13263.
- 107Cieslewicz M, Tang J, Yu JL, et al. Targeted delivery of proapoptotic peptides to tumor-associated macrophages improves survival. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013; 110(40): 15919-15924.
- 108Leal J, Dong T, Taylor A, et al. Mucus-penetrating phage-displayed peptides for improved transport across a mucus-like model. Int J Pharm. 2018; 553(1–2): 57-64.
- 109Reich LL, Dutta S, Keating AE. SORTCERY-a high-throughput method to affinity rank peptide ligands. J Mol Biol. 2015; 427(11): 2135-2150.
- 110Manzo G, Scorciapino MA, Wadhwani P, et al. Enhanced amphiphilic profile of a short β-stranded peptide improves its antimicrobial activity. PLoS One. 2015; 10(1):e0116379.