The US Nuclear Navy has an exceptional record of reactor process safety. In over 50 years of nuclear plant operations with as many as 100 operational reactors, the Nuclear Navy has not had a single loss of life or major environmental accident because of process safety. Compare this to the record of all too frequent serious process safety accidents in industries covered by OSHA's process safety management (PSM) regulation and one may wonder, “What's caused the difference?”
Although some may say that comparing a military organization and civilian industrial facilities is impossible, this article compares Rickover's reactor process safety philosophy to the regulations and guidelines applied to industrial PSM to provide readers with potential ideas for improving the implementation of PSM. © 2011 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Process Saf Prog, 2011
, , Statement before the subcommittee on energy research and production of the Committee on Science and Technology, U.S. House of Representatives, May 24, 1979. Available at: http://www.taproot.com wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/Rick overCongressionalTestimony.pdf.
- 2US Department of Labor, Process safety management of highly hazardous chemicals, OSHA 1910.119. Available at: http://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=STANDARDS& p_id= 9760.
- 3Congressional Testimony, Available at: www. taproot.com/wordpress/archives/16148.
Center for Chemical Process Safety,
Plant Guidelines For Technical Management Of Chemical Process Safety, Center for Chemical Process Safety,
American Institute of Chemical Engineers,
, Ethical decisions—Morton thiokol and the challenger disaster: Telecon Meeting, online ethics.org Retrieved April 11, 2011. Available at: http://www.onlineethics.org/Topics/ProfPractice/PPEssays/thiokolshuttle/shuttle_telecon.aspx.